Proposition 22, which handed in a statewide vote in November, exempts the so-called gig economic system companies from a state labor legislation requiring extra firms to rent employees as workers and supply them advantages. The choose discovered that Proposition 22’s provisions tying the legislature’s palms concerning which employees are coated by employee’s compensation legislation, and concerning collective bargaining in future gig work, violate the state’s structure.
“If the individuals want to use their initiative energy to limit or qualify a ‘plenary’ and ‘limitless’ energy granted to the legislature, they have to first achieve this by initiative constitutional modification, not by initiative statute,” Alameda County Superior Court docket Decide Frank Roesch mentioned within the ruling.
Uber vowed to attraction and mentioned it expects to win. “This ruling ignores the need of the overwhelming majority of California voters and defies each logic and the legislation,” Uber spokesperson Noah Edwardsen mentioned in an electronic mail. “In the meantime, Prop 22 stays in impact, together with the entire protections and advantages it offers impartial employees throughout the state.”
The California lawyer basic’s workplace, which defended Proposition 22 in courtroom, didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark.
College of California Hastings legislation professor Veena Dubal mentioned the ruling is an “essential first resolution in what’s going to find yourself being a really consequential authorized battle.”
The California employees compensation legislation points offered within the case are comparatively novel, making it more durable to foretell what’s going to occur on attraction, mentioned Dubal, who supported the plaintiffs in a friend-of-thecourt submitting.
Leave a Reply